- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 08:41:44 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> If we don't use a document to configure the step then parameters would
> be the obvious way to deal with headers, but that would interact badly
> with the decision we just made wrt parameters.
>
> I have to say that for this step, using a document to configure it
> seems pretty reasonable.
I agree - I don't think every operation we can think of has to be
encapsulated in a single step -- a combination of inline input and
p:insert will do the right thing most of the time.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGQCm/kjnJixAXWBoRApcRAJ9zwvwJrQPTtUwMGHVITmNlYbgIMQCcC8Ep
0187BjfbdLaqPSlo3/NQoW4=
=/JsE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 07:42:08 UTC