- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 21:35:23 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say: > | / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: > | | I don't really understand how p:http-request works (as in the 30th April > | | draft). It doesn't seem to be a standard atomic step, since it has > | | attributes that correspond to options. > | > | Ah. True. Those things probably ought to be options. > > Oops. Brain cramp. The method, href, status-only, and override-mimetype > *attributes* are on the ***c***:http-request element, not the step. > > That element is expected to be the document element of the request > sent on the input port. > > Having p:http-request and c:http-request may be asking for trouble. I think we should avoid using XML documents to configure a step unless absolutely necessary. I don't think it's necessary in this case. Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 20:35:33 UTC