- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:11:10 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 13:11:14 UTC
On 5/5/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | [[ > | A.1.8 Label Elements > [...] > | First, I was thinking that we could select trough an pattern > | expression, which elements, I want to label (applying "*" if I really > | want) > > Yes, I guess we could add a match pattern here. > > | Second, I don't really understand that limitation > | > | << If an existing xml:id value conflicts with a previously generated > | value, the step fails. >> > | > | Does it mean that if, I have done a dummy implementation of XProc > | which generate concat($prefix, '0', $suffix), and that there is more > | than two element to label, I am allowed by the spec to fail !!! > > You are required by the spec to fail. I clearly understand that. But the problem is that a conformant implementation CAN rendre p:label unusable...(if I have concat($prefix, '0', $suffix), I am still conformant) Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 13:11:14 UTC