- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 15:05:09 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/2/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > | More generally, the micro-components give me a bit of an uneasy > | feeling. Especially those that perform some "InfoSet CRUD operation". > | They seem to duplicate work that has been already done before. > | Consider for instance the XQuery Update Facility [1] or XForms actions > | like <xforms:delete> and <xforms:insert> [2]. > > Well, neither of those are applicable in this context. The whole > XQuery exercise was a complete duplication of XSLT with a funky > non-XML syntax, so there's certainly precedent. Indeed, minus the build-in grouping capability XSLT has, and that people coming from SQL will be looking for. But that is a different topic! > We can make the time if that's what it takes. On the other hand, most > of these steps hardly seem like rocket science. If you think we're > overlooking significant aspects of any of them, please tell us what > they are. No, I don't think we are overlooking anything significant, we'll just have to pay attention to the details. Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 22:05:15 UTC