- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:23:32 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/1/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: > I submit a proposal to make $p:position available everywhere Is there any reason why we are using a variable rather than a function? I am more used to see host languages expose this type of information to XPath with functions rather than variables. For instance, XForms has index(..), XSLT has current(). Also, I find the naming to be confusing: we can choose a name that makes a clearer distinction between what we mean by p:position and the XPath position(). We can for instance use the name "document-position". Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 02:23:37 UTC