Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 4.7 Comments

/ Jeni Tennison <> was heard to say:
| Should it be a (static) error if there is a step type declared with
| <p:declare-type> that is also declared with <p:pipeline>?

I think we've said that. I've made it more clear. It is a static error
to declare two steps with the same type.

| In XSLT 2.0, for example, we provide the ability for processors to support
| extension functions that are also defined as user-defined functions with
| <xsl:function>, with an override attribute that determines which one wins if
| both are available. I think we might need the same kind of thing here (but would
| certainly not complain if we just said it was an error).

I'm inclined not to go there in V1.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <> | Fast. Cheap. Well. Pick two.            | 

Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 17:04:02 UTC