- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:25:28 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 7/20/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | Furthermore, I think that @select would become VERY interesting in the > | future when we potentially would allow more that just strings.... > > No matter what we allow in the future, the value of the select > attribute will always be just a string. I don't see any future in > which select="anyexpr" is different from value="{anyexpr}"? > Well, not any XML future anyway :-) That's why I spoke about that I hope that some day we will need to make @select return anything else than a string and we will need @select because @value would be useless > > | So, I agree AVT are nice, but I'm not in favor of making @select > | deprecated in any way > > We agreed yesterday not to do AVTs for the Last Call draft. I suppose > we could be persuaded by last call comments to change our minds. I just say it was nice, not necessary ! Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 20 July 2007 21:25:31 UTC