- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:33:37 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 13:33:43 UTC
In some private correspondence, Alessandro pointed out that I was wrong when I said that JAXP allowed an XPath expression without a context. (I'm sure one of the drafts did, but that's neither here nor there...) Instead, JAXP says that the default context is an empty document node. Further, he argued convincingly that the absence of a context node really is an XPath 2.0 feature. I wonder if it wouldn't be best (and certainly more reasonable for implementors) if we adopted the JAXP strategy and said that the default context is an empty document node instead of an error. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Wherever they burn books they will http://nwalsh.com/ | also, in the end, burn human beings.-- | Heine
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 13:33:43 UTC