- From: Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:31:48 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
A few more comments: 4.6.1, example 8, s/c:error/err:error A.1.4, should we state that the code option of p:error should be a QName, in consonance with err:error/@code defined in F.2 ? Cheers, Rui Norman Walsh wrote: > / Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt> was heard to say: > | Norm, > | > | If it's still possible to edit the draft, here are some (small) late editorial > | comments regarding the appendices: > > I gave the webmaster the green light to publish, so I think I'll hold off > and make these edits after publication. Thanks for finding them! > > Be seeing you, > norm >
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 00:32:08 UTC