- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:54:53 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Ok so, in that case, since the behaviour of p:input and p:input kind="parameter" are different, I would argue to mandate the kind attribute to notice visually the difference On 7/6/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > |> | Steps can access the unnamed parameter set using defaulting: > |> | > |> | <p:input name='bar' kind='parameter'/> > |> > |> That would be: > |> > |> <p:input name='bar'/> > |> > |> I guess we could do this. That makes this exactly the same as not > |> specifying any p:input for the parameter input at all, right? > | > | Hum... isn't this supposed to link to the default readable port ? > | <p:input name='bar'/> > | > | nothing would be an error in that case ? > > I don't think it makes sense for parameter inputs to bind to the > default readable port. That would almost certainly raise an error > since it's unlikely that the default readable port will produce > c:parameter or c:parameter-list documents. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A child becomes an adult when he > http://nwalsh.com/ | realizes he has a right not only to be > | right but also to be wrong.--Thomas > | Szasz > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 16:54:57 UTC