- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:50:11 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <873b011w18.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | May I disturb this nice proposition with the namespace matter for | QName parameter names or even values ? I think the namespace bindings for parameters passed to the initial pipeline have to be implementation-defined. As an implementor, two possibilities occur to me immediately: First, you could have a -ns parameter: $ xproc -ns geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" \ -p geo:lat=42 -p -geo:long=-72 -p locale=geo:ma ... Or you could do it with Clark notation: $ xproc -p "{http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#}lat=42" \ -p "{http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#}long=-72" \ -p locale=geo:ma ... How you deal with QName *values* in the latter case is a question you'd have to answer. I'm likely to have a -ns parameter, myself. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To enjoy yourself and make others enjoy http://nwalsh.com/ | themselves, without harming yourself or | any other; that, to my mind, is the | whole of ethics.-- Chamfort
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 13:50:25 UTC