- From: Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:08:24 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Maybe it's something i'm not entirely understanding, but if the exact content (format?) should be implementation defined, it couldn't be used in a cross-platform way. If so, why bind the property to xproc's namespace? Norman Walsh wrote: > Vasil Rangelov says: >> I also suggest a new property called p:platform or something like that which >> would return a string containing different information about the environment >> the XProc implementation is running on. The exact content should be >> implementation defined for security/privacy reasons. A very typical use case >> would be implementation that has several language bindings. In this case, >> this string could contain the name of the language to which the >> implementation is bind to. It could also show OS, available RAM and CPU and >> other cheesy stuff. Most of what would be really useful for this property >> (and also what is most likely to be implemented) could also be used in >> p:product-version though, so I don't feel very strong about it. > > Thoughts? > > Be seeing you, > norm >
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 22:08:29 UTC