- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:44:40 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> If I run XSLT with
>
> <p:xslt>
>
> presumably if I import a pipeline library that contains a pipeline
> named "FormatDocBook", I run that pipeline using the new syntax with:
>
> <FormatDocBook>
Nope. We haven't got any syntax or semantics for running named
pipelines in the language, unless _I_ missed something.
> Except that I probably want to put that in a namespace so that my
> DocBook formatting can be distinguished from yours:
>
> <norm:FormatDocBook>
Indeed -- _pipeline_ names, like component types, should be expanded
names.
> but now I need to write
>
> <p:pipeline name="norm:FormatDocBook">
>
> in the pipeline library.
> Or have I missed something?
Pipelines are special, that's all.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF3sWYkjnJixAXWBoRAgFmAJ9eIJowhWHEsGKl1EQhD+XLvEHT0gCaAqQ7
X0+3les28i0EFtn/OVydnaI=
=voEC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 23 February 2007 10:45:08 UTC