- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:03:42 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Norm, On 2/8/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > But there wasn't WG consensus last week to allow default in those > cases. Someone pointed out that specifying the default in those cases > was no less work than simply using the name on the next step. This is actually a good point. And doesn't that hold true for steps in addition to constructs? That would imply that we wouldn't need the 'default' attribute on <p:output>: for both steps and constructs, if there is one output, then it is the default, otherwise there is no default. Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 05:03:51 UTC