- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:47:37 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <28d56ece0702010747r38cebce7m353202fc863f3a0f@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/1/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > > / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: > | If we don't allow identity to process sequences, then an author has > | to do different things to setup and identity step or placeholder > depending > | on where they are in their pipeline. I think that will make things > | difficult for the pipeline author to understand. > > But they'll have to do those different things for the other components > (xslt, validate, xinclude) why is the identity component special in > this regard? Those component have well defined semantics in terms of the specification they are implementing. In the case of the identity component, my thought was that we *define* it to take and produce sequences. Then it isn't iteration because that is what it does. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2007 15:47:46 UTC