Re: Validate Component

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| On 2/1/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
|> / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
|> | Name: [p:]validate
|> |
|> | Description:
|> |
|> | The validate component runs some form of schema validation assessment on
|> | a document.  It operates in one of two modes:  assertion or annotation.  In
|> | the
|>
|> Do we really want to go this route, or do we want to define three separate
|> components for XSD, Relax NG, Schematron validation?
|
| And what about DTD, NVDL or upcoming (DSDL Part 9) Datatype- and
| Namespace-aware DTDs ?

DTD processing is something that happens at parsing time, and a lot of
DTD processing doesn't even make sense if you start with an infoset,
so I'm happy not to support a validation component for that.
(Datatypes and namespaces not withstanding.)

NVDL will be its own component, I think.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.