Re: QName as a defined term

/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh wrote:
|> Henry suggested that we need a defined term for QName because we
|> sometimes define namespaces in a non-standard way. I constructed the
|> following:
|>
|> <para><termdef xml:id="dt-QName">In the context of XProc, a
|> <firstterm>QName</firstterm> is almost always a QName in the
|> <biblioref linkend="xmlns10"/> (or <biblioref linkend="xmlns11"/>,
|> as
|> appropriate) sense. Note, however, that <tag>p:option</tag> and
|> <tag>p:parameter</tag> values can get their namespace declarations in
|> a non-standard way (with <tag>p:parameters</tag>).</termdef>
|> </para>
|
| Presumably the "(with <tag>p:parameters</tag>)" at the end there
| actually reads "(with <tag>p:namespaces</tag>)"...

D'oh! Yes.
                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | And gentlemen in England now a-bed /
http://nwalsh.com/            | Shall think themselves accursed they
                              | were not here, / And hold their
                              | manhoods cheap whiles any speaks / That
                              | fought with us upon Saint Crispin's
                              | day.--William Shakespeare, Henry V