- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:08:15 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > Henry suggested that we need a defined term for QName because we > sometimes define namespaces in a non-standard way. I constructed the > following: > > <para><termdef xml:id="dt-QName">In the context of XProc, a > <firstterm>QName</firstterm> is almost always a QName in the > <biblioref linkend="xmlns10"/> (or <biblioref linkend="xmlns11"/>, as > appropriate) sense. Note, however, that <tag>p:option</tag> and > <tag>p:parameter</tag> values can get their namespace declarations in > a non-standard way (with <tag>p:parameters</tag>).</termdef> > </para> Presumably the "(with <tag>p:parameters</tag>)" at the end there actually reads "(with <tag>p:namespaces</tag>)"... Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2007 14:08:49 UTC