- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:29:25 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 8/10/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > |> The p:choose step does not have a primary input port, so the pipeline > |> doesn't get one. > | > | How can we define a primary input port on p:choose ? > > First, we'd have to allow p:input on p:choose; we removed p:input from > all the compound steps (except p:pipeline) a while back. > > If we allowed compound steps to declare p:inputs, then I think we > could write rules for p:choose. > > But I'm not sure I want to do that. > Me neither, you answer to my concern now Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 10 August 2007 14:29:29 UTC