- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:45:03 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 10 August 2007 13:45:18 UTC
/ "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: |> The p:choose step does not have a primary input port, so the pipeline |> doesn't get one. | | How can we define a primary input port on p:choose ? First, we'd have to allow p:input on p:choose; we removed p:input from all the compound steps (except p:pipeline) a while back. If we allowed compound steps to declare p:inputs, then I think we could write rules for p:choose. But I'm not sure I want to do that. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The irrational is not necessarily http://nwalsh.com/ | unreasonable.--Sir Lewis Namier
Received on Friday, 10 August 2007 13:45:18 UTC