- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:16:36 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87abt9lgzf.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Whew! I fixed this by largely rewriting 5.1. Please read the p:input section of the 2 August editor's draft and let me know if you think I got it right. / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: | Shouldn't this section also talk about <p:input>s that *aren't* | declarations (ie are used within an atomic step)? We need to say | somewhere that in these cases, the 'sequence', 'primary' and 'kind' | attributes aren't allowed. Yes. | In 5.1.1 Document Inputs, third paragraph says: | | If sequence is specified with the value yes, then a sequence is | allowed. If sequence is not specified, or has the value no, then it | is a dynamic error (err:XD0006) for a sequence of more than one | document to appear on the declared port. | | I think this should say that if sequence is not specified or has the | value "no" then the port must be provided with exactly one document, | or the dynamic error occurs. (At the moment it sounds as if zero | documents would be acceptable.) Agreed. | Also in 5.1.1, it talks about the select expression "matching" nodes. | But if it's a select expression then it must be *selecting* nodes. It | would also be good to explicitly say that the elements are selected at | every level (in other words, the <div>s that are selected in the | example could occur within another <div>) rather than only at the top | level (if, indeed, this is the case -- I can't remember). Right. | The syntax summaries imply that it's not legal to put kind="document" | on a document input port. Is that really the case? Should it be? I think I clarified that. | Spelling mistake in paragraph four of 5.1.2: s/paramters/parameters Fixed. | In 5.1.2.1: I don't think it should be an error if the name attribute | of c:parameter contains a colon and there's a namespace attribute | specified: it can just override the normal namespace binding. | | Section 5.1.2 is very dense, and could do with an example to help | illustrate the concepts, particularly to show the defaulting. Also fixed. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Limited in his nature, infinite in his http://nwalsh.com/ | desires, man is a fallen god who | remembers heaven.-- Lamartine
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 22:17:00 UTC