- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:58:10 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 8/1/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: > | The paragraph after the syntax summary says: > | > | When a pipeline needs to process a sequence of documents using > > ^ a subpipeline that begins with > > | a step > | that only accepts a single document, the p:for-each construct can be > | used as a wrapper around the step that accepts only a single document. > | The p:for-each will apply that step to each document in the sequence > | in turn. > | > | This makes it sound as if the <p:for-each> can only wrap around a > | single step, rather than a subpipeline. > | > | Section 4.2.1 seems to contradict Section 2.8.1, specifically about > | the context position and size. > > In 2.8.1, we say "unless otherwise indicated by a particular step". > > However, I think we have a problem here. > > At one point we were going to use context-position and context-size. > Then we decided that we couldn't and switched to p:iteration-count() > instead of context size. > > Don't we also need a p:iteration-size() or something? YES !!! (a happy one) -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 17:58:20 UTC