- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:38:59 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87647lohgc.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Consider: <p:serialize> <p:option name="href" value="/tmp/out.xml"/> <p:option name="method" value="html"/> </p:serialize> I wonder if we should allow that to be written as: <p:serialize href="/tmp/out.xml" method="html"/> I wonder if we should also allow <p:option name="href" value="/tmp/out.xml"/> to be expressed as <p:option href="/tmp/out.xml"/> I have mixed feelings about both of these, but I find myself doing the latter by accident sometimes and wishing for the former. Now that we have options and parameters clearly distinct, it doesn't seem totally unreasonable to do this. In both cases, I would expect the attribute values to be taken literally. If you want a select, you have to do it the long way: <p:option name="href" select="concat($basedir,'foo.html')"/> Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The great man is he who has not lost http://nwalsh.com/ | the heart of a child.-- Mencius
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 16:39:10 UTC