- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:10:57 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norm, I won't oppose any resistance to remove the @value one because we already have the ability to do <p:parameter name="bar">foo</p:parameter>, and trying to stick to the principle to try to avoid multiple way to do the same thing Mohamed On 4/16/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > Three test cases with > > <p:parameter name="foo" select="5"/> > <p:parameter name="bar" value="$foo+1"/> > > has solidified my believe that that having both @value and @select on > p:parameter and p:option is a recipe for user confusion. > > Are we really sure that's worth the pain? > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > XML Standards Architect > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 19:11:04 UTC