- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:38:51 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ht writes: > ht writes: > I think [<p:parameter name="my:parm" select="$my:parm"/>] should be > allowed ... more importantly because the environment which the > p:import-parameter should use clearly does _not_ create a loop, and > the XPath should be seeing the same environment. I should have added that another reason for taking this route is it means that the spec. doesn't need to rule out self-reference, direct or indirect, because it just isn't possible, and that this makes life simpler for implementations as well. We want to do everything possible to avoid requiring XProc implementations to inspect the internals of XPaths. . . ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGE8aLkjnJixAXWBoRAktYAJwN9/SZDnQf3wFtTyYeubD0eWSXwQCfUSfJ WuDkZlv79h7ebUFaTN+CbAU= =uQqs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 15:39:01 UTC