- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:18:50 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Richard and I had already come to a similar conclusion, indeed at the
semantic level we think "from URI" should _also_ be a component, so
that there's no funniness at that level at all---all inputs come from
flows/pipes/whatever.
Which suggests that the _syntax_ of <p:input> doesn't need to change
at all, just that it provides a shorthand for the use of a 'document'
component that is not available for <p:choose>.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFEp9KkjnJixAXWBoRAsq1AJ4zVKmPKVKxie04Dfsr8GMICzhhBACffg1t
uKHg3kd/7oQL83bmKEpLt20=
=dyw6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 14:19:04 UTC