- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:13:59 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Norm, On 10/25/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > I imagine we still need import-param for the case where we want to > say: > > <p:step type="xslt"> > <p:input .../> > <p:input .../> > <p:import-param name="db:*"/> > </p:step> May I ask what the use case is for this? In any programming language, a construct that lets you pass everything you have in scope to another function/step isn't in my book exactly the type of construct that encourages a clean programming style. Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2006 23:29:19 UTC