New editor's draft: 13 Oct 2006

Folks,

I've published a new editor's draft of the language specification. I
attempted to address the "scope of step names" issue along the lines
that Richard suggested. I think it works *really* well. There are a
smattering of editorial improvements throughout, but the major changes
are in 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, etc. and 4.1.1. I also added a few examples to
Appendix C, just to show how the new style looks for atomic
components.

  http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/ED-xproc-20061013/

and also

  http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/ED-xproc-20061013/diff.html

linked from the top of the spec.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.