- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:43:21 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 13 October 2006 19:44:34 UTC
Folks, I've published a new editor's draft of the language specification. I attempted to address the "scope of step names" issue along the lines that Richard suggested. I think it works *really* well. There are a smattering of editorial improvements throughout, but the major changes are in 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, etc. and 4.1.1. I also added a few examples to Appendix C, just to show how the new style looks for atomic components. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/ED-xproc-20061013/ and also http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/ED-xproc-20061013/diff.html linked from the top of the spec. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Friday, 13 October 2006 19:44:34 UTC