- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:40:34 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 May 2006 18:47:32 UTC
I have to agree with Norm thought process and conclusions. Can anyone present a strong argument against Norm's three main points: >In short: > >1. I think allowing a choice is unacceptably risky. >2. I think requiring XPath 2 is unnecessary. >3. Anyone anxious to use XPath 2 can do so even if we don't provide > it in V1.0 of the language: authors can use the XSLT 2.0 component > and implementors can provide custom components. > >Let's choose XPath 1.0 for expressions in the core language. > > Be seeing you, > norm
Received on Wednesday, 17 May 2006 18:47:32 UTC