- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:01:35 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Richard Tobin wrote: > As far as I remember, we have accepted all use cases without deciding > whether in fact we are going to support them. I think this should be > made a bit clearer in the document, otherwise people will assume > that we have committed to features that we haven't. This is a very good point. We should add a sentence about that at the top of the use case section. It should say something like: "This section contains a set of use cases that support our requirements and will inform our design. While there is a want to address all the use cases in the specifications that are designed to meet the requirements in this document, in the end, the first version of those specifications may not solve all the following use-cases. Those unsolved use-cases may be address in future versions of that specification." --Alex Milowski
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 16:01:47 UTC