- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:26:45 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 3/22/06, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > On the other hand, only a minority of steps will have no output or no > input. You could indicate cases with something like <p:no-input> and > <p:no-output> elements instead. Using Alessandro's example: > > <p:step name="xinclude"> > <p:input href="somedocument.xml"/> > </p:step> > > <p:step name="url-serializer"> > <p:param name="url">file:///somefile.xml</p:param> > <p:no-output /> > </p:step> > > <p:step name="user-credentials"> > <p:no-input /> > <p:output name="credentials" label="..."/> > </p:step> > > I'm not sure whether I really like this design, just pointing out > alternatives. Good idea! This is IMHO an improvement over just having implicit inputs/outputs, but I am not sure yet if I like this or not. Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2006 02:26:53 UTC