- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:15:16 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have an action to say something about my preferences for how XPath
expressions work
Here's what I want simple pipelines to look like. You can consider
this as a proposal either for the 'user' language in a two-language
approach, or the as-defaulted-as-possible version in a one-language
approach:
<pipe>
<step process="xsdValidate">
<input name="schemaDoc" href="my.xsd"/>
</step>
<step process="xslt1.0">
<input name="stylesheet" href="my.xsl"/>
</step>
</pipe>
Seems to me the minimum advance on that to allow conditionals should
look like this:
<pipe>
<choose>
<when test="/root/@version < 3.0">
<step process="xsdValidate">
<input name="schemaDoc" href="stale.xsd"/>
</step>
</when>
<otherwise>
<step process="xsdValidate">
<input name="schemaDoc" href="current.xsd"/>
</step>
</otherwise>
</choose>
<step process="xslt1.0">
<input name="stylesheet" href="my.xsl"/>
</step>
</pipe>
In other words, the 'primary input' document is the context for the
evaluation of XPaths.
This still allows e.g.
<pipe>
<step process="xsdValidate">
<input name="schemaDoc" href="my.xsd"/>
</step>
<choose>
<when test="$format='print'">
<step process="xslt1.0">
<input name="stylesheet" href="print.xsl"/>
</step>
</when>
<otherwise>
<step process="xslt1.0">
<input name="stylesheet" href="screen.xsl"/>
</step>
</otherwise>
</choose>
</pipe>
That is, 'free' variable references use parameter bindings from the
pipeline itself.
Resemblances to SXPipe altogether intentional.
I once again serve notice that I will push back quite hard against any
proposed syntax which does _not_ allow something at most a relabelling
away from my first example above.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEht90kjnJixAXWBoRAhvWAJwJsxzSycSVrAsI8fdVYUI9OlgR+QCfcWyr
VWSg8uppZzQFz1Aga627qZ8=
=nzLm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2006 14:15:28 UTC