Re: Inputs and outputs

Alex Milowski wrote:
> Could we possibly drop the '-port' from the declare* elements so that
> it reads a bit better in that we don't have the 'port port" going on:

My thought exactly!

I would like to add that I prefer this approach (as opposed to step's 
p:with-*), as a user will write more p:step input/output declarations, 
in comparison to p:pipeline and p:choose input/output declarations.


Cheers,
Rui