- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:33:04 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:33:19 UTC
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say: | Also, just as we like to have a <p:with-output> which has a different | element name than the pipeline <p:output>, I suggest we used different | element names here: <p:for-each-input> and <p:for-each-output>. This | makes it clear that a <p:for-each-input> is an input, but not exactly | like the <p:input> and <p:with-input> (all those elements also accept | different set of attributes). Do they? | That gives: | | <p:for-each> | <p:for-each-input from="documents-to-import" | select="/xpath" | label="one-document"/> | <p:for-each-output label="sequence-of-errors" | from="error-for-this-document"/> Yes, but if we move select and label to the for-each, then the attributes on p:for-each-input are exactly the same as the attributes on p:with-input, I believe. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:33:19 UTC