- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:53:56 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 2/15/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > [Definition: Parameter] > > A parameter is input to a Step or an XML Pipeline in addition to the > Input and Output Document(s) that it may access. Parameters are most > often simple, scalar values such as integers, booleans, and URIs, > and they are most often named, but neither of these conditions is > mandatory. That is, we do not (at this time) constrain the range of > values a parameter may hold, nor do we (at this time) forbid a Step > from accepting anonymous parameters. > > We should also keep in mind Erik's point about keeping things simple. > If, at the end of the day, we can describe our requirements and use > cases without appeal to "parameters" (if they can all just be > generalized as kinds of input to a Step or Pipeline), we can and > should remove this term. But for the moment, it seems that several of > us want to be able to speak about them, so let's define them. Hi Norm, (and welcome back!) I completely agree. (With both your suggestion of a definition for "parameter" and the point you make that we might end up finding a way to keep things simple and coming up with one construct that works for both parameters and inputs) Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2006 02:54:03 UTC