- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:50:26 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <878xscwj65.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: | Henry S. Thompson wrote: | |> With respect, I think it's important _not_ to conflate inputs and |> parameters. This connects up with our discussion on the call |> yesterday: inputs, in the prototypical case at any rate, are XML |> documents, whereas parameters are (or are adequately modelled as) |> name-value pairs. Not at all the same thing, and confusing to try to |> use a single term to cover both. | | Here I have to agree as I view parameters as something that might be | a simple value (like a string) or an XML document, while inputs | are *only* XML documents. Right. I agree as well, but going back to Alessandro's point that "parameters" is not well defined, I propose we add: [Definition: Parameter] A parameter is input to a Step or an XML Pipeline in addition to the Input and Output Document(s) that it may access. Parameters are most often simple, scalar values such as integers, booleans, and URIs, and they are most often named, but neither of these conditions is mandatory. That is, we do not (at this time) constrain the range of values a parameter may hold, nor do we (at this time) forbid a Step from accepting anonymous parameters. We should also keep in mind Erik's point about keeping things simple. If, at the end of the day, we can describe our requirements and use cases without appeal to "parameters" (if they can all just be generalized as kinds of input to a Step or Pipeline), we can and should remove this term. But for the moment, it seems that several of us want to be able to speak about them, so let's define them. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 18:50:41 UTC