- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:25:16 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 12/21/06, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > Worse. Makes the first pass through the document grind to a halt at > the first component. The good thing about the non-combined format, > that you can read it quickly through section 3 and get a sense of the > language, is lost. I guess it depends how your brain is wired. To get a feel of what a new language is about, I tend to look at the examples and the syntax first. With what we have right now, this means starting at section 4.2. > Compromise suggestion: include _one_ _short_ example of the the XML > representation at the end of each subsection of the current > (non-combined) format's section 3. I will take the compromise you suggest as an improvement over what we have now. But still prefers Norm's combined version. Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 15:25:34 UTC