Alessandro, I think we have two choice at this time 1/ Keeping the model with few elements, but a lot of data models (up to 4 data models for the p:output and p:input element) or 2/ Adding Three new elements and having less Polymorphims of elements I may be wrong but I think what gives more headache to pipeline hand writer, and also for code completion tools, is especially the first case Mohamed On 12/7/06, Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> wrote: > > > On 12/6/06, Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com > wrote: > > P.S. Any other discussion before tomorrow's call? > > Murray, > > <p:internal step="step1" port="result" />, <p:external href="..." />, > and <p:here> here document</p:here> do look good: they are consistent > and readable. However, I have been writing quite a few pipelines over > the last few years, and I can't help thinking about those who will be > doing the same in XProc over the next few years. So while I like how > readable and consistent your proposal is, I am afraid that by adding > those elements we would be going down the road of XML Schema or WSDL: > we would be creating a syntax so verbose that those who will have to > use it will hate it. > > Alex > -- > Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): > http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 08:43:47 UTC