- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:19:20 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norm Walsh wrote: > / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: > | For-each, choose, viewport (and group) are all special because if we > | tried to describe them as components, we would need to pass in pipelines > | as one or more of the inputs. I'm going to use pipeline="yes" to > | identify such inputs in the following discussion. > > What you've outlined is certainly logical, but I just don't think of > the "body" of these constructs as pipelines passed as an input. And > I'm really reluctant to start describing them that way. I was describing them as components in order to identify a syntax that was consistent across language constructs and consistent with how steps are normally called. I wasn't arguing that we should describe them in that way in a spec. Regardless: 0. The syntax we have for <group> and <choose> is fine as it is. 1. The documents input to for-each should be specified by source/href/select attributes on the <for-each> element, not on the <input>/<declare-input> element that declares the (single) document input for the nested pipeline. 2. The document input to viewport should be specified by source/href/select attributes on the <viewport> element, not on a <input>/<declare-input> element that declares the (single) document input for the nested pipeline. 3. On <viewport>, the XPath that selects the subtrees to be processed should be specified by a 'subtrees' (or similarly named) attribute, rather than a 'select' attribute (which conflicts with the 'select' attribute that in all other cases selects the document that forms the input for a process). 4. We need to indicate the restrictions on the inputs/outputs in the nested pipelines of <for-each> and <viewport>, namely that they both must have one primary input that accepts a single document, and that <viewport> must have one primary output that generates a single document. Cheers, Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 15:19:41 UTC