- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:55:20 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 16:55:54 UTC
Bruce Chapman <bruce.chapman@nec.co.nz> writes:
> There are a couple of ways of addressing this issue IMHO.
As Vojtech observed, this is explicitly covered by err:XD0001.
The WG is not inclined to extend the p:xslt step at this time.
Please let us know if you're unsatisfied by this resolution.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Politics is the art of looking for
http://nwalsh.com/ | trouble, finding it whether it exists
| or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and
| applying the wrong remedy.--Ernest Benn
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 16:55:54 UTC