- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:55:20 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 16:55:54 UTC
Bruce Chapman <bruce.chapman@nec.co.nz> writes: > There are a couple of ways of addressing this issue IMHO. As Vojtech observed, this is explicitly covered by err:XD0001. The WG is not inclined to extend the p:xslt step at this time. Please let us know if you're unsatisfied by this resolution. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Politics is the art of looking for http://nwalsh.com/ | trouble, finding it whether it exists | or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and | applying the wrong remedy.--Ernest Benn
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 16:55:54 UTC