- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:00:46 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 13:01:52 UTC
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > "Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes: > >> I think the sentence is important, I wouldn't drop it. What about: >> >> "Pipeline must behave as if it evaluated each step each time it is >> encountered?" > > I'll try that. > >> But perhaps "occurs" is OK, and it is just me and my shaky English that >> I didn't understand the right meaning behind the original sentence. > > No, it's ambiguous. I'm not sure that "encountered" is significantly > less so, but...maybe it's better. Done. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Do not condemn the judgement of another http://nwalsh.com/ | because it differs from your own. You | may both be wrong.-- Dandemis
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 13:01:52 UTC