- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:47:21 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:48:02 UTC
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: > As for myself, I think we cover this case well enough. But to make > things really clear, we could consider making it more explicit in 5.5 > (p:log) that the output of p:log is not only implementation-defined, but > it *may also not be XML at all*. > > Another thing: the output of p:log may not be retrievable at all - for > instance when you use some kind of a 'write-only' service that just > stores some records somewhere. You can log to /dev/null as well. I think you're right. I tightened the prose up just a little bit to be more explicit on this point. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is good to have an end to journey http://nwalsh.com/ | toward; but it is the journey that | matters, in the end.--Ursula K. LeGuin
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:48:02 UTC