- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:16:32 +0000
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
2009/2/5 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>: > "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: > >> States >> The XProc processor must support a few additional functions in XPath >> expressions evaluated by the processor. >> >> Suggest >> >> An XProc implementation must support additional functions in XPath >> expressions as defined in this section. > > No, I don't like that. It suggests, to me, that there's some special > constraint on implementations not otherwise imposed on processors. > The processor is what must support the additional functions. In which case be explicit about 'a few', i.e. which additional functions must be supported? That was the intent of my comment Norm? Just clarity. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:17:07 UTC