- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:01:56 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:02:41 UTC
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: > States > The XProc processor must support a few additional functions in XPath > expressions evaluated by the processor. > > Suggest > > An XProc implementation must support additional functions in XPath > expressions as defined in this section. No, I don't like that. It suggests, to me, that there's some special constraint on implementations not otherwise imposed on processors. The processor is what must support the additional functions. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A language is a dialect that has an http://nwalsh.com/ | army and a navy.--Max Weinreich
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:02:41 UTC