- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:41:17 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 21:41:58 UTC
Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes: > Stricto sensu, that cannot be a QName for real, as this is in > content. XProc says explicitly that the content values that are lexically QNames must be valid QNames with respect to the in-scope namespaces on the element on which they occur. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There might very well be nothing; nor http://nwalsh.com/ | anyone. No one to notice that there is | nothing, and to consider that natural. | But that there is something, and, | whatever it may be, the strange thing! | I shall never cease being amazed at | this.--André Gide
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 21:41:58 UTC