- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:04:23 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Norman Walsh writes: > Hello world, > > Consider this example: > > <p:rename match="/*" new-name="x:foo"/> > > All well and good, but suppose that you're *generating* this step > with, for example, and XSLT transformation. I expect that it's > possible to make sure that a namespace binding is generated, but I'm > not sure that a conformant XSLT processor is required to support that. > > I wonder if we should allow > > <p:rename match="/*" new-name="x:foo" new-namespace="http://..."/> > > Thsi would apply to p:rename, p:wrap-sequence, and other steps that > allow the user to specify a QName. Presumably you mean <p:rename match="/*" new-name="foo" new-namespace="http://..."/> Yes, good idea. But for V1? I guess we're not back to Last Call yet. . . ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLFPg3kjnJixAXWBoRAu4MAJsHZzSyVRLuuaAzdZbioHsFVkcMjACfZdNt SeM7UYAKZsD7zr66t5uv2Uk= =5Lso -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 11:04:55 UTC