Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified

mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com> writes:
> Why does it have no name ?
> Couldn't we just keep the name of the primary output port ?

I guess it could, but that might introduce real subtlety considering
how far back you might have to look to find the named port. (Consider
a step that ends with a call to a pipeline that ends with a call to a
pipeline that ends with a step that has an output port with a name.)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We cannot put off living until we are
http://nwalsh.com/            | ready. The most salient characteristic
                              | of life is its coerciveness: it is
                              | always urgent, 'here and now' without
                              | any possible postponement. Life is
                              | fired at us point blank.--José Ortega Y
                              | Gasset