- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:47:37 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 14:49:34 UTC
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: > Which is correct? In my opinion, '%26' should be decoded - otherwise, I > don't see the point of having p:www-urldecode at all. Also, there would > be no functionality in XProc to turn strings like %41%42%43 into proper > string values... > > What do you think? I think you're right. I fixed the test (and my code :-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One's never alone with a rubber duck. http://nwalsh.com/ |
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 14:49:34 UTC