- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:47:37 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 14:49:34 UTC
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:
> Which is correct? In my opinion, '%26' should be decoded - otherwise, I
> don't see the point of having p:www-urldecode at all. Also, there would
> be no functionality in XProc to turn strings like %41%42%43 into proper
> string values...
>
> What do you think?
I think you're right. I fixed the test (and my code :-)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One's never alone with a rubber duck.
http://nwalsh.com/ |
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 14:49:34 UTC