Re: p:exec - path separators

"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes:

> It sound good to me. You are using err:XX0063 instead of err:XC0063
> because err:XC0063 does not yet exist and you are not sure whether the
> proposal will stay?

Neither, I just ham-fingered the code :-) it should be XC0063.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Most human beings have an almost
http://nwalsh.com/            | infinite capacity for taking things for
                              | granted.--Aldous Huxley