- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:26:36 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 17:27:17 UTC
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:
> I noticed that the Relax NG schema for XProc
> (http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/schemas/xproc.rng) defines (and uses)
> the types WithOptionValue, VariableValue and WithParamValue in addition
> to WithOptionSelect, VariableSelect and WithParamSelect. I understand
> why there is OptionValue and OptionSelect, but I don't think that having
> the same for p:with-option, p:variable and p:with-param is actually
> correct. Or is it?
No, it's not. Nice catch! I think OptionValue is wrong too, we only
need OptionDeclaration and OptionSelect. (I wonder if I should change
the pattern names now that we don't need the select/value distinction?
Probably not worth the trouble...)
                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm
-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If you understand: things are as they
http://nwalsh.com/            | are. If you do not understand: things
                              | are as they are.
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 17:27:17 UTC